<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:06:17 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Official Blog for PTP Alliance</title><link>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:41:40 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Opinion: Putting the National Interest First</title><category>House of Representatives</category><category>Infrastructure</category><category>Ports-to-Plains Alliance</category><category>Reauthorization</category><category>Senate</category><category>Transportation</category><dc:creator>Joe Kiely</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:06:20 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/2012/2/23/opinion-putting-the-national-interest-first.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">542022:6315841:15160397</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 150%;"><a href="http://transportation.nationaljournal.com/2012/02/infrastructure-becomes-campaig.php#2167121" target="_blank">Click here for complete article</a> &gt; National Journal Transportation Blog</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">February 22, 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">By Jack Schenendorf, Counsel, Covington &amp; Burling LLP<span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.ptpblog.com/storage/Jack_Schenendorf.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1330027843296" alt="" /></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Jack represents the Ports-to-Plains Alliance on transportation matters.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">~~~~~~~~~~<br /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">This week&rsquo;s question focuses on some of the challenges--such as partisan politics and parochial interests--facing Congress and the Administration as they attempt to enact a multi-year surface transportation bill. Also this week, we just so happen to be celebrating the birthdays of Presidents George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, two Presidents who were very much concerned that partisan politics and parochial interests could weaken America and keep it from achieving greatness&hellip;</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/rss-comments-entry-15160397.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Disappointed but not discouraged … Ports-to-Plains University Transportation Center Application</title><category>Energy</category><category>House of Representatives</category><category>Infrastructure</category><category>New Mexico</category><category>Ports-to-Plains Alliance</category><category>Senate</category><category>South Dakota</category><category>Texas</category><category>Theodore Roosevelt Expressway</category><category>Trade</category><category>Transportation</category><dc:creator>Joe Kiely</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:58:20 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/2012/2/20/disappointed-but-not-discouraged-ports-to-plains-university.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">542022:6315841:15115210</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Texas Tech University, University of New Mexico and South Dakota School of Mines and Technology had submitted an application for a Tier I University Transportation Center (UTC) to USDOT&rsquo;s Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA) in late 2011 that was specifically focused on the Ports-to-Plains Corridor.&nbsp; The UTC was designed to study the challenges regarding international logistics, trade law, ecosystem health and sustainability, and workforce development for agricultural and energy commerce along corridors of national significance.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">The announcement below did not fund the application, but the concepts remain alive. &ldquo;Yes, we are disappointed, but not discouraged (!).&nbsp; Working on the proposal for funding helped us to recognize the extent to which our research already dovetails with issues relevant to increasing economic activity along the PTP corridor&rdquo; said Donna Davis of Texas Tech University following the announcement. &ldquo;The process also enabled us to integrate research efforts by identifying potential research activities that cross disciplines at TTU and reach beyond TTU to UNM and SDSM&amp;T.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">&ldquo;The support of the Ports-to-Plains Alliance, including the Heartland Expressway Association and Theodore Roosevelt Expressway Association, was greatly appreciated by the universities,&rdquo; said Phil Nash of Texas Tech University.&nbsp; &ldquo;We were also very pleased with the strong support we received from federal elected officials across the region.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Additionally, higher education institutions throughout the region were included in successful applications.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Tier I Participants</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">University of Denver, Denver, Colorado</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">University of Texas, El Paso,&nbsp; El Paso, Texas</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">Texas Southern University, Houston, Texas</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Regional Participants</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">Texas A&amp;M University, College Station, Texas</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">Texas Southern University, Houston, Texas</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">University of Texas, Austin, Austin, Texas</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">University of Colorado, Denver, Denver, Colorado</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">University of Denver, Denver, Colorado</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">This is the good news.&nbsp; Transportation is an important research topic within the Ports-to-Plains Region.&nbsp; Texas Tech University, University of New Mexico and South Dakota School of Mines and Technology know more about the needs of the Alliance and are committed to help address those needs. Let&rsquo;s open the doors to the other institutions with projects that we need to have completed.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">The Ports-to-Plains Alliance wishes to thank Texas Tech University, University of New Mexico and South Dakota School of Mines and Technology for their recognition of the importance of the corridor, their cooperation in developing the application and their commitment to research benefitting the economy and transportation system of the region.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">~~~~~~~~~~</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;"><strong>U.S. Transportation Secretary LaHood Announces $77 Million in Transportation Research and Education</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Click here for complete release &gt; <a href="http://www.rita.dot.gov/press_room/press_releases/rita_001_12/html/rita_001_12.html" target="_blank">U.S. Department of Transportation</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Office of Public Affairs</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">January 17, 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood announced today $77 million in grants to 22 University Transportation Centers (UTCs) to advance research and education programs that address critical transportation challenges facing our nation. The UTCs, which are located throughout the United States, conduct research that directly supports the priorities of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), and the participating universities are a critical part of our national transportation strategy...</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/rss-comments-entry-15115210.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Updates on Transportation Reauthorization … Waiting, Waiting, Waiting…</title><category>House of Representatives</category><category>Reauthorization</category><category>Senate</category><category>Transportation</category><dc:creator>Joe Kiely</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 23:21:31 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/2012/2/18/updates-on-transportation-reauthorization-waiting-waiting-wa.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">542022:6315841:15093568</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 150%;"><strong>House Puts Off Debate on Transportation Provisions until Week After Next </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Click here for complete article &gt;<a href="http://www.aashtojournal.org/Pages/021712house.aspx" target="_blank"> AASTHO</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">February 17, 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">The House of Representatives began debating Wednesday a surface transportation and energy package, which was split into three parts after 300 amendments were filed with the House Rules Committee. Floor debate and amendments this week were limited to the energy provisions; work on the highway/transit and revenue sections was postponed until the week of Feb. 27 after a delay was announced Wednesday by House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">During a five-hour-long House Rules Committee meeting Tuesday evening, the panel decided to move the massive bill ahead as three separate parts and spread out debate over two weeks. In addition to the transportation section, the other pieces raise revenue to pay for certain transportation projects and authorize expanded oil and gas drilling&hellip;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">~~~~~~~~~~</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;"><strong>Senate Resumes Floor Work Feb. 27 on MAP-21 </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Click here for complete article &gt;<a href="http://www.aashtojournal.org/Pages/021712senate.aspx" target="_blank"> AASTHO</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">February 17, 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">The Senate voted 54-42 this morning to limit debate on a package of committee-approved amendments to a two-year, $109 billion surface transportation reauthorization measure, falling six votes short of the 60 required. Work is expected to continue behind the scenes during next week's recess to reach an agreement limiting amendments, with floor consideration resuming Feb. 27.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Senators voted 85-11 last week to proceed to a full debate on the surface transportation reauthorization legislation, S 1813, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Progress was slowed this week by the introduction of non-germane amendments including, for example, insurance coverage for birth control, foreign aid to Egypt, and energy development&hellip;</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/rss-comments-entry-15093568.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Ports-to-Plains Alliance Selects Medicine Hat as Site of 2012 Conference</title><category>Alberta, Canada</category><category>Conferences</category><category>Ports-to-Plains Alliance</category><dc:creator>Joe Kiely</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:24:04 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/2012/2/16/ports-to-plains-alliance-selects-medicine-hat-as-site-of-201.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">542022:6315841:15060208</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Click here for complete release &gt; <a href="http://www.ptpblog.com/storage/EATC%20P2P%20AGM%20News%20Release%20Feb%2015%202012%20FINAL.pdf" target="_blank">Eastern Alberta Corridor</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">February 15, 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">The Eastern Alberta Trade Corridor partners and the City of Medicine Hat are pleased to announce that the Ports-to-Plains Alliance headquartered in Lubbock, Texas has chosen Medicine Hat as the venue for its 2012 Conference and Annual General Meeting October 2‐4, 2012.</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/rss-comments-entry-15060208.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>West Texas Trade Summit, San Angelo, TX, February 22-24, 2012</title><category>Conferences</category><category>Economic Development</category><category>Economy</category><category>Freight</category><category>Infrastructure</category><category>Mexico</category><category>Ports-to-Plains Alliance</category><category>Texas</category><category>Trade</category><category>Transportation</category><dc:creator>Joe Kiely</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:42:46 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/2012/2/16/west-texas-trade-summit-san-angelo-tx-february-22-24-2012.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">542022:6315841:15059919</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">Please join us for the<br /><strong style="font-size: 150%;">3rd Annual West Texas Trade Summit</strong><br />hosted by the<br />Southern Trade Task Force<br />City of San Angelo Development Corporation/City of San<br />Angelo/San Angelo Chamber of Commerce</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;<span style="font-size: 150%;">Wednesday, February 22, 2012<br />Welcome Event<br />Top of the Cactus<br />36 E. Twohig<br />7 PM to 10 PM<br />$20 Welcome event only</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">&nbsp;<br />Thursday, February 23, 2012<br />Conference<br />Stephens Downtown Library<br />33 W. Beauregard<br />9 AM to 4 PM<br />$50 Registration includes welcome event</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;<span style="font-size: 150%;">The Southern Work Group was established by the Ports-to-Plains Alliance to promote trade relations, transportation networking, and other economic development issues of mutual interest between Texas and the Mexican states that follow the Ports-to-Plains Corridor to the coastal ports.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.ptpblog.com/storage/PROPOSED%20AGENDA.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 150%;">Full Agenda</span></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://purchase.tickets.com/buy/TicketPurchase?orgid=31207" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 150%;">Online Registration</span></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.ptpblog.com/storage/2012%20Registration%20form.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 150%;">Registration Form</span></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: 150%;"><a href="http://sanangelotexas.us/index.asp?SEC=%7B8F45EC38-2C34-4156-871A-20F66D8215ED%7D&amp;Type=GALLERY" target="_blank">Hotel and Other Information</a><br /></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: 150%;">Please plan to join us for this important meeting.</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/rss-comments-entry-15059919.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>White House threatens veto of GOP's highway bill</title><category>House of Representatives</category><category>Infrastructure</category><category>Reauthorization</category><category>Senate</category><category>Transportation</category><dc:creator>Joe Kiely</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:52:17 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/2012/2/15/white-house-threatens-veto-of-gops-highway-bill.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">542022:6315841:15054246</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Click here for complete article &gt; <a href="http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/02/14/3732606/transportation-boosted-to-top.html" target="_blank">Star-Telegram: Associated Press</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">February 14, 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">After years of procrastination, the White House and Congress have suddenly boosted a long-term plan to improve the nation's roads, bridges and transit systems to the top of the political agenda.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">This week the House and Senate are set to take up vastly different bills providing a blueprint for shoring up the nation's aging transportation system. Lawmakers are driven in part by a desire to show voters a major accomplishment in an election year when regard for Congress is at rock bottom. They are pitching the bills as jobs generators, although it may be more accurate to say they preserve jobs that might otherwise be lost if Congress doesn't find a way to keep highway and transit programs solvent.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">President Barack Obama chimed in Monday with his own plan to spend nearly half a trillion dollars over six years on transportation infrastructure. But the president's plan is so much grander than anything Congress is likely to go along with that the administration has swung its weight behind the Senate bill, a bipartisan plan that more modestly proposes to spend $109 billion over less than two years&hellip;</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/rss-comments-entry-15054246.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Obama budget would boost renewables, nix oil and gas tax breaks</title><category>Energy</category><category>Natural Gas</category><category>Oil</category><category>Renewable</category><category>Solar</category><category>Wind</category><dc:creator>Joe Kiely</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:02:30 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/2012/2/15/obama-budget-would-boost-renewables-nix-oil-and-gas-tax-brea.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">542022:6315841:15048763</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ptpblog.com/videos/2012/1/30/the-myth-of-oil-gas-industry-subsidies-credits-grants-unders.html" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 150%;">Want more into on "tax preferences" Click here</span></a></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">~~~~~~~~~~<br /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Click here for complete article &gt; <a href="http://fuelfix.com/blog/2012/02/13/president-calls-for-increased-funding-for-renewable-energy/" target="_blank">Fuel Fix</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">February 13, 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">President Barack Obama called today for boosting funding for pipeline safety and renewable energy while again proposing to roll back several tax breaks for the oil and gas industry.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">In his fiscal 2013 budget proposal, submitted to Congress today, Obama proposed boosting research funding and extending tax credits for clean energy as well as providing more money for energy-efficiency programs. He also called for rolling back oil and gas &ldquo;tax preferences&rdquo; worth $40 billion over 10 years&hellip;</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/rss-comments-entry-15048763.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Texans Are Baffled by the Keystone Decision: China will get the oil from Canada that could have come to the U.S.</title><category>Alberta, Canada</category><category>Canada</category><category>Economy</category><category>Energy</category><category>Oil</category><category>Permitting</category><category>Pipelines</category><dc:creator>Joe Kiely</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:55:23 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/2012/2/14/texans-are-baffled-by-the-keystone-decision-china-will-get-t.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">542022:6315841:15040918</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Click here for complete article &gt; <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203824904577215623915733132.html" target="_blank">The Wall Street Journal: Opinion by Rick Perry, Governor of Texas</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">February 13, 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper was in Beijing recently signing an agreement and touting his country's growing energy partnership with China. It's good news for Canada, which is rightfully looking to grow markets for its sizeable oil reserves. And it's particularly good news for China, which needs to keep tapping into fresh supplies to feed its growing economy and mounting demand for oil.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Unfortunately, it's bad news for Americans, particularly when you consider that one of the main reasons China has become such an attractive market to Canada was President Obama's recent rejection of the Keystone XL Pipeline. This cross-border connection would have provided a golden opportunity to partner with our neighbors to the north in producing massive amounts of energy, both for our country and the globe&hellip;</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/rss-comments-entry-15040918.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>TransCanada cleared in Keystone review</title><category>Alberta, Canada</category><category>Canada</category><category>Energy</category><category>Permitting</category><category>Pipelines</category><dc:creator>Joe Kiely</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:55:52 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/2012/2/10/transcanada-cleared-in-keystone-review.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">542022:6315841:14979819</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Click here for complete article &gt; <a href="http://www.edmontonjournal.com/business/TransCanada+cleared+Keystone+review/6131522/story.html" target="_blank">Edmonton Journal</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">February 10, 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">An internal investigation into the U.S. State Department's handling of an environmental study of the Keystone XL oilsands pipeline has found "no evidence" that Calgary-based TransCanada Corp. improperly influenced the process.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">The review, conducted by the State Department's office of the inspector-general (OIG), concluded the Canadian pipeline company had "minimal influence" in the selection of a third-party contractor to conduct the Obama administration's environmental impact statement on the proposed $7-bil-lion pipeline.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">In a report to U.S. lawmakers, the inspector general's office also dismissed allegations by Keystone XL critics that Obama administration officials gave preferential treatment to TransCanada lobbyists.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">"OIG found no evidence that communications between department officials, TransCanada, the Canadian government, proponents, and opponents of Keystone XL deviated from the department's obligations under federal law," the report said.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">"Specifically, no records existed showing that department officials had made inappropriate commitments on behalf of the department to TransCanada or to the Canadian government."&hellip;</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/rss-comments-entry-14979819.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Senate Votes 85-11 to Begin Full Debate on Surface Transportation Reauthorization</title><category>Infrastructure</category><category>Reauthorization</category><category>Senate</category><category>Transportation</category><dc:creator>Joe Kiely</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:35:10 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/2012/2/10/senate-votes-85-11-to-begin-full-debate-on-surface-transport.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">542022:6315841:14979540</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">Click here for complete article &gt; <a href="http://www.aashtojournal.org/Pages/021012senate.aspx" target="_blank">AASTHO Journal</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">February 10, 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">The Senate voted 85-11 Thursday afternoon to proceed to a full debate on legislation that would reauthorize federal surface transportation programs through September 2013. Consideration of amendments is expected to begin Monday evening or Tuesday.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;">"Today's vote to proceed with the surface transportation bill is a significant step in the right direction," Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairwoman Barbara Boxer, D-California, said in a statement issued Thursday evening. "The 85 votes in favor illustrate how much widespread support this job-creating legislation has. MAP-21 is truly a bipartisan bill."&hellip;</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.ptpblog.com/official-blog-for-ptp-alliance/rss-comments-entry-14979540.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>
