Ports-to-Plains Investors










Ports-to-Plains Alliance

Entries in Colorado Legislature (3)


That Grantham speech on doomed transportation bill may haunt the Capitol

Colorado Senate President Kevin Grantham,Ports-to-Plains Alliance would like to express its appreciation to Colorado Senate President Kevin Grantham for his sponsorship of HB 17-1242. His impassioned words prior to the final vote in the Senate Finance Committee were spot on.

The Colorado Statesman

May 1, 2017

“We do worry about the Balkanization of our state roads system. If Colorado Springs and then northern Colorado and other RTAs start passing their own [funding and development plans], there will be donut holes throughout the state that will be left out of improvements and will never get the improvements that are needed. Maybe that’s the preferred solution for some. It’s not for me… But that is the direction we are heading, and I think it’s a dangerous one…” 

“I don’t know what would happen if it went to the people… But I know, without a doubt, that if it doesn’t get on the ballot, then it will definitely never pass. We only get so many bites at the apple — I’ve heard that a lot today — but if the number of bites we get is exactly zero, then zero is the result we will get.”

The session’s unloved grand bipartisan transportation measure, House Bill 1242, is dead, but the closing remarks — you might say the sickbed epitaph — delivered for the bill by Republican sponsor and Senate President Kevin Grantham are worth revisiting, especially given that, in the last week, and with a little more than a week left in the legislative session, three new transportation-related bills have been introduced.

Grantham spoke right before the bill was dispatched Tuesday by the Republican members of the Senate Finance Committee, addressing the bill and its critics with words that might come to resonate beyond the committee hearing, even if in a ghostlike way, floating into remarks made years from now by lawmakers begging please for someone somehow to expand I-25 south of Castle Rock or to find a way to get their aged mother or father to the doctor in the middle of the day.

Grantham said running this year’s bill was a brave and bold move. He said the bill was unloved on the left and the right because drumming up billions for much-needed transportation upgrades in a politically and ideologically divided swing state was always going to be — and is long likely going to be — a slog.

He said people in the Capitol have to begin seeing transportation in new ways, and doing that is hard to do. He suggested that the long era of roads and more roads and single-occupancy privately owned vehicles no longer serves the population of the state the way it once did — and particularly the state’s younger and older populations — and that transit, meaning mass-transit, is popular with residents even if it’s unpopular with lawmakers.

Read on… 


Colorado lawmakers’ grand bargain on transportation appears doomed

The Denver Post

April 20, 2017

The Colorado legislative session’s top priority, a major transportation bill that seeks a tax hike to improve and expand highways, is unlikely to win approval this term.

Senate President Kevin Grantham, a Cañon City Republican and one of the prime sponsors, announced Thursday morning that he does not have the votes to move it through the GOP-led chamber.

“At this point, we can’t count to three,” he said, describing the number of votes he needs to advance it through the Senate Finance Committee next week.

The bill sponsors continue to work to secure support, but Grantham did not express optimism that the vote total would shift. House Bill 1242 won approval in the Democratic-led House earlier this year but faced tougher obstacles in the Senate because it would ask voters for a 0.5 percent sales tax hike to generate money for a $3.5 billion bond package for roads.

Read on...


Colorado General Assembly's Transportation Legislation Review Committee: Fort Morgan, CO: Speakers talk of varied transportation concerns

Her final concern was on funding for the Ports-to-Plains Corridor, which is intended to create a shipping route from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico.

Locally, that involves State Highway 71 directly and State Highway 385 indirectly.

"71 and 385 are among the last two parts of that whole Canada to Mexico corridor," Shull said. "The traffic it would take off of (Interstate) 25 would be tremendous. Ports-to-Plains is huge for farm-to-market and huge for energy."

Click here for complete article > Fort Morgan Times

The General Assembly's Transportation Legislation Review Committee listens as Cathy Shull shares her thoughts on transportation needs in northeast Colorado at the committee's July 24 stop in Fort Morgan. (Jenni Grubbs / Fort Morgan Times)Northeast Colorado has a wide variety of needs when it comes to transportation, the members of the Colorado General Assembly's Transportation Legislation Review Committee heard at their listening tour stop in Fort Morgan Wednesday.

After they had heard from state transportation officials, Morgan County and the city of Fort Morgan, the committee opened the floor to other speakers.

One of the speakers was Fort Morgan resident Cathy Shull, who is the executive director of the political advocacy and education group Progressive 15, is involved with the transportation study group Impact 64, is on the Ports-to-Plains Corridor Executive Board and is a local small business owner. She shared some of the things she has heard about from being active in all of these groups…